What's happened
A Massachusetts town approved flying the Palestinian flag for a month, while a federal court ruled that a Pennsylvania community's resolution prohibiting the display of an American flag with a thin blue line on all township property is unconstitutional.
Why it matters
These court rulings highlight the ongoing debates surrounding the display of flags and the balance between free speech and public sentiment.
What the papers say
The New York Post reports that a Massachusetts town approved flying the Palestinian flag for a month, following a petition by a college student. The updated flag-flying policy limits the use of the flagpole to statements of governmental speech only. On the other hand, AP News and The Independent report that a federal court ruled that a Pennsylvania community's resolution prohibiting the display of an American flag with a thin blue line is unconstitutional, as it restricts the free speech of public employees.
How we got here
The Massachusetts town had previously flown the Israeli flag on the same pole following the Hamas terror attacks, leading to the petition for the Palestinian flag. The Pennsylvania community's resolution against the thin blue line flag arose due to concerns of discontent and distrust in the community against the police.
More on these topics
-
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to pe