What's happened
Swiss women from Senior Women for Climate Protection win a landmark case at the European Court of Human Rights, highlighting the government's failure to combat climate change adequately.
Why it matters
The ruling sets a significant legal precedent for climate-related cases globally, emphasizing the importance of governments taking action to protect citizens from the impacts of climate change.
What the papers say
The European Court of Human Rights' ruling on the Swiss climate case has been widely covered, with various sources highlighting the legal significance and potential implications of the decision. The judgment has been praised for recognizing the link between climate change and human rights, with experts noting the potential for similar cases to be brought against other countries.
How we got here
The case was brought by a group of Swiss women who argued that the government's inadequate climate policies were putting them at risk, particularly during heatwaves. The ruling underscores the growing recognition of climate change as a human rights issue and the need for governments to take more decisive action to address it.
Common question
More on these topics
-
Switzerland, officially the Swiss Confederation, is a country situated in the confluence of Western, Central, and Southern Europe. It is a federal republic composed of 26 cantons, with federal authorities based in Bern.
-
The European Court of Human Rights, frequently referred to as the Strasbourg Court, is a supranational or international court established by the European Convention on Human Rights.
-
The European Convention on Human Rights is an international convention to protect human rights and political freedoms in Europe. Drafted in 1950 by the then newly formed Council of Europe, the convention entered into force on 3 September 1953.
-
France, officially the French Republic, is a country consisting of metropolitan France in Western Europe and several overseas regions and territories.